On paper, MoCA 2.5 supports 2.5Gbps transfer. MoCA 2.5 offers a host of improvements in terms of speed, ease of setup, and so on. While there are still MoCA 2.0 adapters on the market, we recommend everyone skip them and jump straight to buying MoCA 2.5 adapters. Just like you wouldn't buy a Wi-FI 802.11b adapter today, you wouldn't buy a MoCA 1.0 adapter. Just like there are different generations/versions of other networking standards like Ethernet and Wi-Fi, there are different versions of MoCA. But if you've already got it running through a convenient spot in your home, these adapters open up a whole new world of possibilities for times when you need the kind of stable, wired connection that even the best Wi-Fi hardware can't provide in every part of every home.How Fast Is MoCA? Are There Different Versions? To be clear, you will need that existing coax cable in place to make this a worthwhile option. However, given the difficulty, time, and cost associated with Ethernet installation, infrequent slowdowns seem like a far better trade-off than spending hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars replacing existing coax cable with Ethernet. If this is something you do often, it's worth taking into account. The only time you may notice the roughly 30% speed decrease I recorded when compared with a pure Ethernet run is when you're transferring large files between PCs on your home network. Even demanding scenarios like 8K video streaming shouldn't be a problem. Still, unless you're planning to run many devices through these adapters, you're very unlikely to max out that transfer rate. It's a great time to upgrade your Wi-Fi with the latest mesh networking systems for improved coverage. While the above test showed the adapters were capable of more than handling the 100Mbps my broadband connection provides, the much faster 1 gigabit per second (Gbps) theoretical speed of my home network proved to be more of a challenge. This means for gaming and online video and audio streaming, the performance of the adapters is functionally identical to having a similar length run of Ethernet in use instead. Results: The download, upload, and latency results are all within just a few percentage points, plus or minus, between the two setups. NexusLink Ethernet over Coax adapter (30 feet of coax, 12 total feet of Ethernet) The test was conducted over 100Mbps broadband. The average transfer rate and time are shown here.ĭownload (DL) and upload (UL) figures are in megabits per second (Mbps), while latency (Lat.) is in milliseconds (ms). For each transfer rate test I used four files of varying sizes, transferred five times each. For each scenario I did five speed tests across three testing sites.I tested two scenarios: download/upload rates and latency figures when connecting to the public internet, and transfer rates for large files transmitted between networked PCs.I ran two tests: one with the original 40-foot run of Ethernet cable, and a second series with the adapter setup.I replaced a 40-foot run of Ethernet cable (Gigabit network switch>Gigabit Ethernet port on a desktop PC) with the two adapters, connected by a 30-foot run of coaxial cable between them.More: The 5 best internet speed tests: Test your broadband connection If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |